Basis of land organization
Mind cliff of efficient organization of army
The merit is not crushed.
Avoid the organization to crush the merit such as tanks and infantrymen who exclude ..heavy.. [wo].
The artilleryman is applied to the landing force. (-80%)
Air infantry and tank(eating of replenishment ..[karachou] it not acceptable..)
Garrison troops such as infantrymen. (The infantryman cannot move. )
It is a cavalryman in a strong force such as the mechanization infantrymen. (Different branches of the military come off and push from the cavalryman and are defeated. )
Correct example
Mobile power loses and applies [wazu] different branches of the military (following description) well.
The merit doesn't collapse basically easily for the same arm or + engineer.
The point to unite the speeds by choosing the heavy tank is *.
If the accident is said, it is a point that has been matched to the heavy tank until mountains infantryman's production time.
Bad concrete example
Out of the question
The mobility of the mechanization infantryman is crushed.
Meaning none of Marine Corps
It comes off from different branches of the military by the wise dispensation of Providence.
The mountains infantryman doesn't have mobile power.
The mountains attack power cannot be made use of for the defense.
Strength in the heavy tank cannot be made the best use of.
The tank should not be put backward.
Suitable width of the front is given to the brigade in division.
It doesn't take part in a battle when the brigade with the width of the front in division is 0 and it is defeated even at the partisan.
Moreover, when a lot of brigades of 0 in the front width are applied, inefficiency according to the stacking penalty.
When the width of the front is four, ten in combatting the front width is not operated easily in the arena of warfare.
Concrete, bad example
The width of the front cannot participate in 0 combats.
HQ's not participating in the combat either : for this.
The width of the front is too small.
When these kind of things gathers by as many as ten division, it is not good by the stacking penalty.
I cannot use the geniality to special replenishment.
Ten in combatting the front width is not used easily in the arena of warfare.
Various arm union is borne in mind.
The combat efficiency can be raised by various arm union bonus.
Because the bonus can be quickly obtained
When division that consist of the armored vehicle are manufactured, I want to bear it in mind as much as possible.
Good concrete example
It is in various arm union correction and it is efficient.
It is possible to correspond to geographical features various though it is a heavy tank.
Various arm union correction is obtained.
The engineer notes that the vulnerability falls for the research.
| | |
